Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A beneficial., & Rumiati, R. We. (2021). Brand new sum out-of personality and you can cleverness to the intellectual competences within the higher knowledge. Frontiers when you look at the Mindset, a dozen, 2566.
Damian, R. I., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, A beneficial., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). Sixteen taking place sixty-six: An effective longitudinal study of identification balances and change around the 50 years. Diary from Personality and you may Societal Mindset, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, An excellent. M., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of one’s triarchic make of psychopathy and thinking-said Team B personality diseases characteristics. Character Disorders: Theory, Research, and you may Treatment, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A great., & Monsen, J. (2009). Characteristics and you can intelligence assume academic school levels. Training and individual distinctions, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Anticipating instructional and you may personal–mental outcomes in the emerging adulthood of cleverness, character, and you may socioeconomic reputation. Record away from Personality and you may Social Psychology.
Holland, A. S., & Roisman, G. I. (2008). Huge Five character traits and you may relationships high quality: Self-advertised, observational, and you can mental research. Diary regarding Personal and private Matchmaking, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Meters. (2006). The relationship ranging from cleverness and you may breakup. Record off Family unit members Circumstances, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology from Team-B Identification Conditions about Four-Foundation Model Position. Chinese Mental health Record.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). School training and you will low-intellectual experience development. Oxford Economic Paperwork, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The brand new effect out-of parents’ and you may spouses’ degree on splitting up prices into the Norway. Group research, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, Elizabeth. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. M., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Analysis from actual attractiveness as the a function of decades. The fresh new Journal off Personal Psychology, 125(2), 157-168.
Lover worthy of get refuse (or not), although it does maybe not be seemingly a buffer in order to dating formation
McGue, Yards., Anderson, E. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, A., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not by the g by yourself: Some great benefits of a degree certainly one of people who have lower levels out of standard cognitive element. Cleverness, ninety five, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, M. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Is social anyone way more stunning? A zero-acquaintance studies out of agreeableness, extraversion, and attractiveness. Diary from Research into the Character, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The new correspondence between school poverty and you may agreeableness in predicting educational attainment. Identification and you will Personal Distinctions, 127, 85-88.
Standard faculties out-of identity and you can affectivity because the predictors out-of fulfillment from inside the romantic relationship: Proof out of thinking?and you may spouse?critiques
Tatarunaite, E., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial appeal: a beneficial longitudinal studies. Western Journal off Orthodontics and you can Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flood, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Provided Social Play cet article with Microdata Series, Current People Questionnaire: Version 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. Yards., Allen, E. S., & ). Reasons for having split up and you can recollections from premarital intervention: Effects having improving dating education. Partners and you can Family relations Psychology: Research and practice, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). How come characteristics anticipate divorce proceedings? Numerous routes as a result of fulfillment. Journal regarding Character and you can Societal Therapy, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. A good., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. An excellent. (2008). A behavioral genetic analysis of your Dark Triad plus the Big 5. Identity and you may private Variations, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. A good., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, Meters., Clark, L. An effective., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, Roentgen., … & Wright, A beneficial. G. (2019). Character in an effective hierarchical model of psychopathology. Clinical Mental Technology, 7(1), 77-ninety five.
The present day CPS data dont show in case your likelihood of separation and divorce was ingredient. Connections you can expect to suggest mixed marriages has actually highest or down threats than the total risks of several anybody. Although not, early in the day search toward divorce proceedings and you will education implies that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The newest divorce case risk for 2 PhD people is all about 15%, consistent with the personal risk of 7-8% getting individual PhD people.
Buss, D. Meters., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Ray, D. (2017). The companion altering theory. Personality and you can Individual Distinctions, 104, 143-149.